The trial court denied the motion. Evan Miller (Miller v. Alabama) Evan Miller was 14 years old when he killed his 52-year-old neighbor Cole Cannon in 2004. After a trial, Miller was found guilty of murder during the course of arson. The teenager had entered Cannon’s trailer, where he robbed the man of approximately $350 and a baseball card collection and struck him repeatedly with a bat before placing a sheet over his head and declaring, “I am God. Miller v. California (1973) Material is obscene only if it presents patently offensive sexual conduct and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value (the "LAPS" test) Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs . Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. “The Supreme Court and the Sentencing of Juveniles in the United States.” Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinics of North America, v… Statement of the Facts: Evan Miller, age 14, and an accomplice killed Cole Cannon in 2003. The ruling requires a judge to take into consideration the age of the offender before sentencing him or her to life without parole. The Supreme Court in 2012 abolished mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole in Miller v. Alabama. Miller v. Alabama Case Brief. Siegel, David. Montgomery v. Louisiana . The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari on November 7, 2011, and scheduled Miller’s case to be argued in tandem with Jackson v. The court in Miller ruled that while sentences of life without parole were still permissible, they could only be imposed after judicial consideration of the individual circumstances and the court must consider the offender’s maturity level. “Miller v. Alabama and (Past and) Future of Juvenile Crime Regulation.” Minnesota Journal of Law and Inequality, v.31/2 (2013). Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that its previous ruling in Miller v. Alabama (2012), that a mandatory life sentence without parole should not apply to persons convicted of murder committed as juveniles, should be applied retroactively.This decision potentially affects up to 2,300 cases nationwide. Miller v. Alabama (2012) The 2012 Miller v. Alabama ruling made it unconstitutional to sentence someone who was under the age of 18 at the time of the crime to mandatory life without parole. Scott, Elizabeth. Miller v Alabama U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits sentencing any juvenile offender who … The decision prohibited mandatory life without parole for juvenile homicide offenders, allowing the sentence only in rare cases after consideration of a teen’s circumstances and potential for change. On Monday, Miller, now 28, will appear before an Alabama county judge for a re-sentencing hearing in which he will take into account “a child’s ‘diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change.’ ” Those instructions come directly from the Supreme Court, which ruled in a landmark 2012 case that bears Miller’s name — Miller v. They killed Cannon by beating him with a baseball bat and then setting fire to his trailer home with Cannon inside. Following the finding by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Miller’s application for rehearing was denied, as was Miller’s petition for certiorari to the Alabama Supreme Court. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.